I’ve written about Balfour Beatty before as a company with attractive income and growth characteristics.
This global infrastructure business certainly does what I like to see a company doing, which is to grow consistently for years at a time. The latest set of half-year results show that this trend is not yet over, with revenues up 7%, adjusted earnings up 28% and the dividend up 6%.
You can see what this looks like in the chart below.
The long-term growth rate has been something like 12% a year, and the current dividend yield is just below 5%. Both of those are attractive figures, especially since the company has increased underlying earnings and dividends in all but one of those past ten years.
It is widely diversified across the globe and is, in my opinion, a strong business in an industry that is unlikely to disappear anytime soon.
Price and value
So let’s turn to the question of price, or more importantly, the value that an investor would receive at the current price.
Looking at the price first, that is, of course, very easy. The price on the 17th of August 2012 is 291.6p if you are buying and 291.4p if you are selling. That was easy, but unfortunately, the question of value is not one that can be solved with so little effort.
I am a value investor, and as such, you might reasonably expect me to have some opinion on the ‘underlying’ value of Balfour Beatty or to have some special means of calculating it. Sadly, neither is true. I think it would be entirely possible to come up with all manner of reasons as to why BBY should be trading at 200p and just as many reasons why it should be more than 400p.
The fact is that investing is about the future, and when it comes to equities, nobody really has the faintest idea of what the future will bring. That is precisely why almost everybody fails to beat a blind and passive market tracking approach, and it’s also why the whole thing is so interesting in the first place.
This uncertainty is why I’m not a fan of ‘target’ prices. Who exactly is aiming at this target? Given that share price movements in anything but the long-term are essentially random, having a ‘target’ price seems to me to be somewhat too close to what goes on inside a casino.
I prefer to think of equity investments as only having a relative value, that is, a value relative to what else the stock market has to offer.
So, for example, when I look at Balfour Beatty, I know that, at least in the past, it has grown at about 12% a year, which is well above the average FTSE 100 or FTSE 250 company. I know that the dividend yield is almost 5% which is also well above average and, at the same time, seems likely to keep growing. I also know that it has grown more consistently than most other companies, with growth not coming in one or two fabulous years but as a continuous stream of yearly success.
The fact that Balfour Beatty offers a higher historic growth rate which has been achieved more consistently than with most other companies, means that I would perhaps expect it to trade at something of a premium relative to other companies. And yet the current share price means that the dividend yield is higher, and the long-term price-to-earnings ratio is lower than most other mid and large-cap companies.
I think, at the very least, this makes it an interesting proposition.
I own shares in Balfour Beatty, and the UK Value Investor model portfolio also holds Balfour Beatty.