Investment books I have read

A reader recently asked me for a list of books that I’d recommend to other investors. Flattered that anyone would care what I thought, I’ve decided to do a post on that very subject, and here it is. This is a list of the books and studies that have most influenced my thinking so far, both positively and negatively.

Secrets for Profit in Bull and Bear Markets (Stan Weinstein)

This is a book about technical analysis. I spent a short while trying to apply technical techniques and failed miserably. Of course, this means I now think this approach is of no value.

How to Make Money in Stocks (William O’Neil)

Covers both technical and fundamental analysis, including things like earnings, new products, management, growth, that sort of thing. It also covers technical strategies to help time your purchase, like “buy on a new high from a properly formed base”. I tried this approach for a while but found the chart aspects too ambiguous and too much work.

Various books by Jim Rogers of the Quantum Fund

I got into macroeconomic predictions for a while, playing the game that almost everybody else plays (which is why it’s such a bad game to get into). It didn’t take me long to see that this was either a game for short-term traders or for people who wanted to bet on decade-long themes… neither of which was me.

The Intelligent Asset Allocator (William Bernstein)

This book is awesome (dude). Just about everything I know now is down to this book. It very clearly lays out the ideas behind Modern Portfolio Theory and easily sold me on it since it requires almost no effort to apply. After reading this I adjusted my portfolio to a split between US, UK, European and Japanese index trackers and I think a bond tracker too. I’m still on the side of the efficient market to a large extent, certainly for people who don’t have an interest in stock picking. However, this book also covers bubbles in history and how markets may be predictable. It also talks about how value investing has the best long-term results, and how good companies are usually bad investments and bad companies are usually good investments.

The Intelligent Investor (Benjamin Graham)

I was moved to by this book because it is mentioned in The Intelligent Asset Allocator. This is my favourite investing book so far. It clearly demonstrates how the market swings from one extreme to another, extrapolating the last year’s earnings off into the distant future instead of taking them as part and parcel of any normal business cycle. I have the 1946 version and will at some point get the newest version to see what the differences are.

What Has Worked in Investing (Tweedy Browne)

This booklet is largely responsible for my current approach to value investing. The studies go over and over the idea that portfolios made up of low PE or low PB small companies are the best performers. It talks about debt levels (lower is often better) and past earnings growth (the more past earnings growth the less there is likely to be in the future and vice versa). It is a very compelling read if you like academic studies that are tested in the real world.

Time and The Payoff to Value Investing (Rousseau, Rensburg)

This study looks at high and low PE portfolios held over various time periods. “The conclusion is that on an annualised basis the returns to value portfolios become noticeably higher at time horizons extended beyond 12 months”. In other words, value investors can take advantage of the short time horizon of the average investor by taking a longer view.

Corporate Turnaround (Stuart Slatter)

I guess by this point I’d invested in Ennstone and watched it crash into the ground like a dart. So understandably I became interested in what killed companies, what sort of thing you’d do to turn a company around and what sort of thing a turnaround specialist would be looking for in a company before he decided if it was doable or not. From my point of view, this is important as I’m looking to invest in struggling companies which can quite often be classed as borderline turnarounds.

Financial Control (David Irwin)

This is a book for someone running a small business or doing the books for a small business (which I had recently become). I found it useful for learning about some accounting ratios, specifically balance sheet ratios like quick, current, credit and debt turnover rates, how long a company can survive without sales etc.

Testing Benjamin Graham’s Net Current Asset Value Strategy in London (Xiao, Arnold)

This is another study of low PB stocks, but in this case specifically the classic net-net Graham stocks. The results are compelling, motivating and possibly astounding. If you have the guts to invest all of your capital in perhaps less than 5 companies (see 1997), all of which are basket cases, then you are welcome to the excess returns and you’re braver than I.

Having said that, I still would like to set up a portfolio based on net-net stocks, but I’d mitigate the extreme risk by holding a portion in cash depending on the value of the overall market. That way when the market is cheap and there are more net-nets around you are more diversified and need less cash, but when the market is expensive and net-nets can be counted on one hand, you hold a lot of cash so even if they all blow up you aren’t burned too badly.

The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville (Warren Buffett)

A well-written set of arguments against the efficient market and in favour of value investors (of course).

Wall Street Revalued (Andrew Smithers)

This book, along with The Intelligent Asset Allocator, is where I really formed my current ideas on the timing and valuation of markets. Smithers shows, as others have done, that sensible measures of value do exist for markets. It is, therefore, possible to say something about whether a market is over or underpriced and by how much, at least relative to historic norms.

This allows you to estimate expected future returns based on history and produce some nice bell curves. In the future, you can compare these with the return distribution predicted by the standard model (a distribution that does not change over time as far as I’m aware, or at least does not change with market value) and see who was right.

The Snowball (Alice Schroeder)

Not really an investing book but it’s still a great read if you’re interested in Buffett and has a lot of ideas about investing and perhaps most importantly to me, the idea of building your snowball as early and as fast as you can. The most important factor in personal investing, orders of magnitude more important than investing style, is to start saving more money earlier, the more and the earlier the better.

Value Investing : The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners From Losers (Piotroski)

Richard Beddard is a big user of the F-score (the subject of this paper) and it does seem to have some merit. I have started to integrate this into my screens and am also going to watch my current holdings to see if there is any evidence that high F-score companies turn around quicker than low F-score companies.

Determining Value (Richard Barker)

Finally, my chosen approach doesn’t really pay too much attention to things like discounted cash flows or dividend growth models etc. So I’m working through this book to gain a better perspective of how more mainstream value investors do their work and come up with their values. That way I’ll be able to have a more meaningful conversation with them and perhaps it will add to my understanding of value.

Well, that’s one man’s journey from indexer to deep value, feel free to outline some other books that you’ve found useful in shaping your investing worldview.

Patience is required

Investing can be a bit like religion in that it requires a good dose of faith.  When you buy into a company it could be years before you get any feedback on whether it is a good idea or not.  In the mean time you just have to kneel before a picture of Ben Graham and say “I believe” before you go to bed each night.  The same goes for the portfolio as a whole where you might under perform a simple stock/bond split for what seems like an eternity. 



As well as faith and patience, it also helps if you get your kicks somewhere other than the stock market.  Or, if you really want to get your kicks from your investments then perhaps take up day trading.  Put bluntly, the market can move sideways longer than you can stand the inaction (see 2010 for a good example).


Value investing as I practice it seems to sit rather uncomfortably in the middle of the active/passive continuum.  At one end you have passive indexing, where you don’t do anything at all for huge stretches of time and frankly don’t give a damn.  Once a year or so you get out of bed and rebalance and that’s about it.  At the other end you have day trading, or variations thereof.  Here you get to trade a lot, every day.  If you close your positions at the end of the day you see your realised profit and loss each day which is a nice time scale for feedback.  


The old school value investor has neither of these pleasures.  You just get to sit and watch, in my case once a week, watching the prices go up and down and up and down again.  Occasionally a dividend drops in which livens things up a bit.  Months may tick by (in the last year I’ve bought into four new companies) in which nothing happens.  Your faith will be tested by the grinding inactivity of it all and only the patient will stick with the game plan.


Value investing is not hard.  It is not complicated.  It is out there for all to see and should have long ago been vaporised by the efficient market.  But it is beyond dull for most people and that dullness is an effective barrier to entry.  That barrier is high enough to require a premium before anyone will do it, so in one sense the value premium is a dullness premium.  Remember the employees of Graham and Dodd, in their grey coats with stacks of forms, filling out a form for each company, checking to see if the numbers met their criteria?  That is the definition of boring to me.  


And to put the boot in one more time, Gordon Gekko was not a value investor, the masters of the universe were not value investors, nor the dot com venture capital crowd.  Value investing has a you-are-not-cool premium too.


I can’t do much about coolness, but to combat the dullness I’ve tried looking at value investing like a very slow game of chess with a certain Mr Market.  The moves come perhaps only once every quarter, the outcome is uncertain, but seeing the process as a game definitely helps to gets me in the right frame of mind.  More importantly, it keeps me in the game.


Bought and Sold


Nothing whatsoever, which is precisely the point of this post.


Dividends
 
J Smart paid out a small dividend which brings the realised gains from that company to 3.5%, or 4.6% annualised.  Titon, now my largest holding by market value, paid out yet another dividend, taking realised returns to 8.5% or 4.6% annualised.  So although this was a down month for the market values of both the FTSE100 and my portfolio, my book value still went up very slightly, which to me is the most important thing.


FTSE 100 value


Today the FTSE 100 stands at 4916.  My rather patchy data puts the current 10 year real PE at 12, Richard Beddard thinks it’s 14 (although I think that’s nominal rather than real), which is close enough for me.  I’m currently estimating the long term average real PE10 as 13.8 (an amalgamation of various sources) so we are slightly on the cheap side.  On this basis I would allocate 75/25 to UK stocks/bonds in an ETF portfolio, using my asset allocation method that I’ve written about previously.


House prices


I think prices are likely to end up between 3 and 4 times average earnings.  Anything over 5x is crazy.  We are currently at about 5.5, which means I won’t be buying again any time soon.


Charts and tables


I’ve updated the current holdings, trade history and benchmark pages with the latest data, feel free to browse around.

Buying Assets and Financial Strength

Over the past 6 months, I’ve worked on my approach to finding good investments and I think I’m quite happy for now. I started out just looking at price to book, which often gave me companies with lots of debt, i.e. Ennstone, which then fell over at the first sign of trouble.

Then I looked at liquidation value and cash flow, to protect against such a failure. However, I’ve now simplified it so that I pretty much just look at liquidity (current and quick ratios) and debt-to-equity ratios.

Once the companies are filtered by those criteria I just buy whatever is cheapest to book, with half book being the most I’ll pay.  The ratios I use aren’t set in stone, but they are ballparks to get me started and the amounts come from various texts as ‘reasonable’ amounts.

Ennstone teaches me an important lesson

I think it can be difficult to learn anything without actually living it. So handily Ennstone, my first purchase of a value stock using not much more than price to book, has fallen over into the abyss. This is good for a number of reasons, although of course not so good for the staff.

Continue reading “Ennstone teaches me an important lesson”